Flywheel bhp figure
- Thread starter Galen
- Start date
Galen
Lifer
Galen
Lifer
GTti
Member +
A Dynapack will also read higher as there is less dead weight because you've dropped 20KG+ from your drivetrain. So your result will be slightly more optimistic than when your wheels are on the road.
I'd just expect a real 160-170bhp figure, dont go boasting 180bhp because you could well go on a different dyno that calculates 160bhp @ fly.
I'd just expect a real 160-170bhp figure, dont go boasting 180bhp because you could well go on a different dyno that calculates 160bhp @ fly.
GTti
Member +
I'd say thats good for the CT9, and you have alot of torque and midrange from that turbo. Lots of useable power and torque. Just ensure that on WOT you have enough fuel being pushed into the engine, the CT9 will probably start 'blowing hot' around 1bar or more.
Galen
Lifer
Thanks, I dont be boasting, if anyone asks i tell them 148@wheels!
Galen
Lifer
Do ya think I should uprate fuel pump and maybe injectors at this stage? Or would the NEO be doing a good enough job?
GTti
Member +
Were your AFR's measured during the dyno run? You may have a seperate graph for this. It's best to keep an eye on these with a wideband sensor and gauge. They can be bought for around £160-180. Well worth the money if you want your engine to last.
Untill you know this, you can't really answer your question. I would suspect you're OK with the standard turbo.
Untill you know this, you can't really answer your question. I would suspect you're OK with the standard turbo.
Galen
Lifer
To tell the truth i dont know. They didnt say there was any problems with fueling, they said everything was running fine. Thanks for the help, il look into it!
HYBRID
Super Moderator <a href="http://www.toyotagtturbo.
lol unless the neo does miracles i doubt anybody can say that.. but no u dont need to uprate the pump or injectors for the ct9 @ 1 bar... best thing u could do with the setup u have is add a rrfpr & use the neo to trim it down..
@ luke, besides hes using an hks fcd cant really say how thats affecting things, the hks ones love to lean out the rev range as theyre resitor type fcds... so unless this guy really put the fcd down low & raised with the neo (to increase fuel, yet avoid fuel cut, as both modify the same map signal) then i really have no idea how he has increased his fuelling...
GTti
Member +
Yes, it would be much more preferable to have one that clamps close to the fuel cut. I myself wouldn't run any of them regardless 
I wouldn't trust this opinion, their idea of running fine might not be fine on the 4EFTE. (Just because similar results are OK on another engine)
I'm assuming that the AFC has been set up previously by someone and not just thrown in
I wouldn't trust this opinion, their idea of running fine might not be fine on the 4EFTE. (Just because similar results are OK on another engine)
I'm assuming that the AFC has been set up previously by someone and not just thrown in
Galen
Lifer
Yes, it would be much more preferable to have one that clamps close to the fuel cut. I myself wouldn't run any of them regardless
I wouldn't trust this opinion, their idea of running fine might not be fine on the 4EFTE. (Just because similar results are OK on another engine)
I'm assuming that the AFC has been set up previously by someone and not just thrown in
Oh yeh it was set up before hand!! And while it was been dyno'd they made a few adjustments on the neo and gained 5bhp