STARLET N/A
Member +
I reckon 220.5 atf
What bhp???
- Thread starter ianmcintoshi
- Start date
Captain Starlet
Member +
So how come you stated yours was 250? with bascially the same mods.
whiteglanzav
Member +
around 210 i would say 
ianmcintoshi
Member +
Hey, Got her mapped today
It made 174hp and 142ftlb at the wheels. Not too sure what that makes it at the fly but its over 200 so im pleased
What do you guys think?
It made 174hp and 142ftlb at the wheels. Not too sure what that makes it at the fly but its over 200 so im pleased
What do you guys think?
Last edited:
ianmcintoshi
Member +
Does anyone know roughly how much that would be at the fly? I thought it would be around 215bhp which isnt a bad result is it? :S
pig666eon
Member +
well man its around 204 @tf mark i would of guessed a lot higher than that
i was only reading thread today and the lad made more on a ct9 standard boost
http://www.toyotagtturbo.com/forums/showthread.php?76139-My-Rolling-road-result!!
i was only reading thread today and the lad made more on a ct9 standard boost
http://www.toyotagtturbo.com/forums/showthread.php?76139-My-Rolling-road-result!!
ianmcintoshi
Member +
no i think that he made 175bhp @ the fly, i made 174 @ the wheels.
How did you work it out to be 204 @ the fly?
fly is only calculations, wheel horse power is what you want its like that if your transmision loss is 20% then 174x1.2=208.8, but to have that much transmision loss in a starlet you want to be running sand instead of oil inside the gearbox, i made 167whp on standart ct9 @ 1.1bar and was quated 186 at the fly so it was 11% of power loss which sounds about rite considering small gearboxes, wheels, drive shafts, non lsd our litle cars run, another lad had printout of 204bhp on the very similar set up but only 160whp, so i took him out the road to prove that my car was still faster(and it was) but he had bigger penis when it came to braging about the power(thats only on the paper and totaly not true)
ianmcintoshi
Member +
I used the same method except i was told to divide by 0.85 and thats how i came out with 215.
There were no problem at all with the runs, at the time i thought it was making good power... im not sure now tho after some of the above replys.
There were no problem at all with the runs, at the time i thought it was making good power... im not sure now tho after some of the above replys.
ianmcintoshi
Member +
Yeah give me a second ill try find my cable to upload it.
ianmcintoshi
Member +
Sorry mate i cant find it. ill put it up with my mates camera tommorow when i see him.
ianmcintoshi
Member +
It goes really well, a huge improvement over the ct9 which ofcource is what matters most. But its still nice to get a good figure to go by.
Also i forgot to say this was at 13psi, dont know if this make much difference. The mapper said the injectors were pretty much maxed out so couldnt up the boost any further.
stavros
Member +
....what a coinsidence; I have a set of 330cc's in the garage im not using now *whistles innocently*
...
