would like to know what differences are there between them? would one of them eliminates the use of an fpr or do you still need one?
i wont even use emb on any set up dude
EMB would be better martin, li ma nifimx imma li sa ftit zmien ijlu awnekk kienu jahilfu bl-EMB ghal setups ta ct9's u td04s u jajdulek li EMU zejjed u issa ma jridux jafu bieh. fil verita vera ahjar EMU ghax kwazi daqs standalone jahdem mentri EMB kull ma jghamel jibdel is signal tal map. jien gibt EMB ha niprova nahdem bieh ghax mandix bzonn wisq... nuza id dials ta qudiem ghal fueling u software at timing, tercelonline.com juzawh hafna hekk. jekk tithol hemm isib naqa info
veru qabel kulhadd jajjat bih imma issa kulhadd donnu mar al emu. jin minix intiz daqshekk fuqu u ghad baqali ftit biex nasal alih imma ridt nara x'differnzi hemm bejnitom bix nara fl-ahhar mill-ahhar liem wihed jigi jaqbilli l-iktar u al bzonnijiet li rrid jin.
EMB would be better martin,
Just on that statement alone, :haha:
EMU is far superior, EMB 's are pants.
for 250 bhp or less emb is just fine, no point in spending loads on a emu IMO. some people can use a emb just fine, funny that
what about for above 250?
Is everyone who runs more that 250 or whatever on EMU not including standalones?
so is a fpr not needed with emu?
so is a fpr not needed with emu?