The ct9 will have the edge in the low-low/mid rpm range with it's quicker spoolup. The TD04 will be superior from the mid-high rpms. To be honest, if you reseach some of the older turbo discussions, you will find that it's not uncommon for a TD04L 13G to be fitted and tweeked via a good electronic boost controller to greatly reduce the turbo lag. Having driven both setups I would say the TD04 allowed for smoother (if not boring) low rpm off boost cruising while the power was easily available once the throttle is opened or you shift down a gear. The TD04 will be more powerful at the same boost pressure as the ct9 (1bar for e.g) because the smaller ct9 generates more heat to create higher boost levels & has a physically smaller compressor housing. This results in a less dense charge at a lower cubit foot per minute (airflow rate). At the same 1bar of pressure the TD04 will create a cooler, denser charge while moving a greater volume of air into the engine, creating more power.