Tubby MR2.

southwalesgt

Member +
I recently straight swapped my Rev1 Turbo MR2 for My ep82.

The MR2 is great fun to drive - Rev1 like mine comes with pretty much no safety features that you would both want and expect of a 240bhp (ish) mid engined rear wheel drive car.

Snap oversteer is a common problem on REV1's due to pants suspension/roll-bars etc... The biggest most common mods for the first two revisions is REV3 brakes, suspension as a lot is bolt-on upgrades that can be found cheap second hand.

I also had to change the alternator (Common problem as it sits directly below the water run-off on the engine lid :slap: ) And only last a few years. £250 ish if i remember correctly.

Also be wary of coolant pipe leaks underneath the chassis as they are an absolute swine to replace. Engine in rear, radiator in front = a lot of coolant pipes. Fuel lines can also corrode just below exhaust manifold.

The usual rust spots are along the bottom of the side sills, bottom of doors, A-pillars ( all around windscreen) and in front compartment where battery and spare wheel sits.

Personally I prefer the EP82 - I owned the MR2 for just over a year, and in that year they went from being fairly rare to insanely common round my way. The prices have fallen through the arse (havent all cars) but seemed quite severe on the old MR2 MK2. Thats one reason why I prefer the Starlet as people see it and either think "What the hell is that?" or "Nice, dont see many of them"

The MR2 MK2 is a wicked car, especially the REV3+ due to better equipment and revised parts, but they're everywhere! The MR2 was exactly the same insurance as my starlet with Brentacre specialist insurers. MPG was between 20-27 miles depending on how much I thrashed it. (would differ depending on mods done - Mine was only moderately tuned with bolt-on mods) PARTS WERE INSANELY EXPENSIVE FROM DEALER

Stick with the Starlet
 
Last edited:

Dan3SGTE

Member +
im sorry but no way would a 150bhp glanza compair to a stock mr2 turbo up to 4rth gear, unless it was knakerd. even the rev 1/2 are 220bhp and easly tuned to 280for little money.

i though about one insted of my eunos but i wanted the challenge of making a n/a into a turbo and i like FR over MR layout.

very tunable though, seen many of them running 12's with mild mods done to them

Dan,

Why are you even bothering anwsering. Ive completely given up with anwsering back to these ridiculous accusations. No offense intended, but it really is bollox.
 

Dan3SGTE

Member +
Rev 1 will have between 200-220BHP, not 240....... A fair bit slower then the rev 3's. They run a smaller turbo CT26 as appose to the bigger CT20.
 

Galen

Lifer
Deano, you've got a 4WD Avensis!

Shush with your Macca statements, you're a keyboard warrior.

Please don't post in my thread again, thanks.

Whats wrong with a 4WD Avensis?!

No offence mate, this may be YOUR thread but its a PUBLIC forum so you cant decide who can or cant comment.

As for MR2's, lovely looking car, especially with the air intake that goes up the rear pillar, like so
mr2.jpg
 

goldenvtr

Member +
Dan,

Why are you even bothering anwsering. Ive completely given up with anwsering back to these ridiculous accusations. No offense intended, but it really is bollox.

lol i dunno dude, its just annoying sometime i suppose its like why bother saying something like that on a forum where people know what there talking about pretty much 80-90% of the main uses on this site know what a starlet can do with what mods. i dont even think i need to type this eather.......


people just need to thinks before typing :D

oh an nooffence taken.

ill have to try and get a pic of the 2 mr2 turbos i keep seeing about my way, one is a lush midnight purple and another is a gash veilside kitted half white half orange mess with 2 MASSIVE tail pipes haha
 

Deano

Banned
Ffs someone asked me about my car and the 3sgte engine so I gave them information about it that I know and it's not a f**king avensis I don't even know what the hell one of those things are but they sound shit it's a caldina :argue: :mad: :shoot: there is a new video on you tube of a caldina beating a modified sti people think they are shit just coz they are a station wagon I guess the audi rs6 must be shit too then coz thats a station wagon :rolleyes:
 

Guye

Lifer
Ffs someone asked me about my car and the 3sgte engine so I gave them information about it that I know and it's not a f**king avensis I don't even know what the hell one of those things are but they sound shit it's a caldina :argue: :mad: :shoot: there is a new video on you tube of a caldina beating a modified sti people think they are shit just coz they are a station wagon I guess the audi rs6 must be shit too then coz thats a station wagon :rolleyes:
???????
 

Fizturbo

Member +
I recently straight swapped my Rev1 Turbo MR2 for My ep82.

The MR2 is great fun to drive - Rev1 like mine comes with pretty much no safety features that you would both want and expect of a 240bhp (ish) mid engined rear wheel drive car.

Snap oversteer is a common problem on REV1's due to pants suspension/roll-bars etc... The biggest most common mods for the first two revisions is REV3 brakes, suspension as a lot is bolt-on upgrades that can be found cheap second hand.

I also had to change the alternator (Common problem as it sits directly below the water run-off on the engine lid :slap: ) And only last a few years. £250 ish if i remember correctly.

Also be wary of coolant pipe leaks underneath the chassis as they are an absolute swine to replace. Engine in rear, radiator in front = a lot of coolant pipes. Fuel lines can also corrode just below exhaust manifold.

The usual rust spots are along the bottom of the side sills, bottom of doors, A-pillars ( all around windscreen) and in front compartment where battery and spare wheel sits.

Personally I prefer the EP82 - I owned the MR2 for just over a year, and in that year they went from being fairly rare to insanely common round my way. The prices have fallen through the arse (havent all cars) but seemed quite severe on the old MR2 MK2. Thats one reason why I prefer the Starlet as people see it and either think "What the hell is that?" or "Nice, dont see many of them"

The MR2 MK2 is a wicked car, especially the REV3+ due to better equipment and revised parts, but they're everywhere! The MR2 was exactly the same insurance as my starlet with Brentacre specialist insurers. MPG was between 20-27 miles depending on how much I thrashed it. (would differ depending on mods done - Mine was only moderately tuned with bolt-on mods) PARTS WERE INSANELY EXPENSIVE FROM DEALER

Stick with the Starlet

WOW!

Av had a metel plate made after i had it reconditioned to cover over the altanator.
As for the fuel consumption am not complainin,i replaced a recondition engine from an early celica GT4 an its givin me Awesome milage :)
 

ChrisGT

Member +
Guys, is there any difference between say a MKII UK spec GT and MKII JDM spec GT? Can you even buy a turbo-charged UK spec? Looking into this; UK version is so much cheaper to insure than the import and on the quote system its still a "GT" but not sure if its the 3SGTE one its referring to?
 
Top