turbo_time
Member +
what is the max power you can expect to acheive with a standard turbo
ct9b
- Thread starter turbo_time
- Start date
Monkfish
Member +
There are several (Including myself) aiming for the 200bhp mark. Not impossible, it just requires some lateral thinking and a chunk of luck.
I had 179bhp and 152lbs.ft from a CT9a with FMIC, Plugs & Leads, RRFPR, GReddy BCC, HKS Actuator @ 1 Bar, Manifold, Decat and 2.5" Single box system. I've now got a CT9b so I'm not sure what gains (if any) I've had over the CT9a.
I've still got the stock ECU, Cams, Injectors and internals, so I see no reason why 190-195 can't be had with uprated items and a boost controller.
I had 179bhp and 152lbs.ft from a CT9a with FMIC, Plugs & Leads, RRFPR, GReddy BCC, HKS Actuator @ 1 Bar, Manifold, Decat and 2.5" Single box system. I've now got a CT9b so I'm not sure what gains (if any) I've had over the CT9a.
I've still got the stock ECU, Cams, Injectors and internals, so I see no reason why 190-195 can't be had with uprated items and a boost controller.
I know of a Glanza in New Zealand that has 350 hp on stock internals it's the quest 4 starlet and it's green it featured in nz performance car issue 98 It's Nz's quickest Glanza and is running a GT25R turbo. Hey Monkfish did you notice any difference using the ct9b compared to the ct9a?
Last edited:
Adam_Glanza
Member +
yea it is possible on stock internals just by using HIGH octane fuel to contane knock
stuart
Member +
Are you sure? I thought the pistons would ahve gave in and conrods going to hell??? If it is true thats insane!
gorganl2000
Lifer
There are several (Including myself) aiming for the 200bhp mark. Not impossible, it just requires some lateral thinking and a chunk of luck.
I had 179bhp and 152lbs.ft from a CT9a with FMIC, Plugs & Leads, RRFPR, GReddy BCC, HKS Actuator @ 1 Bar, Manifold, Decat and 2.5" Single box system. I've now got a CT9b so I'm not sure what gains (if any) I've had over the CT9a.
I've still got the stock ECU, Cams, Injectors and internals, so I see no reason why 190-195 can't be had with uprated items and a boost controller.
as far as i know scottishcruiser recorded 172WHP on his ct9a......he had all the supporting mods in place though
i think JAM racing did 196bhp on the ct9 also......so u guys still got a bit to go....:rockon:
hardcoreep
Member +
JAM made 190bhp, 172WHP on the CT9b.
Monkfish
Member +
Felt torquier low down in the revs as the turbo was spooling, but I think I've lost a bit off the top end. Need to get a RR confirmation though.
Indeed, but if you can get the CT9 to make and hold 1.1 bar with some good cooling (Which is where the lateral thinking bit comes in) then with cams, uprated ECU, boost controller and a damn good tune, I can't see why 200 can't be done.
Make that 8
Nice figure :rockon:
Smore
Lifer
i did 191.1bhp(fly) with 178lbs ft of torque on a ct9a (1.0bar)with all support mods in place, would have got a bit more if i had had bigger injectors as they were reaching thier safety max
with the G-Spec i made 203bhp(fly) and 192.9lbs ft of torque (1.1bar) needed bigger injectors to go further
it is possible
with the G-Spec i made 203bhp(fly) and 192.9lbs ft of torque (1.1bar) needed bigger injectors to go further
it is possible