J
*JO*
Guest
ah well done for getting your money back. your lucky he turned up to.
really glad you stuck to your guns and sorted it
xxx
really glad you stuck to your guns and sorted it
xxx
ah well done for getting your money back. your lucky he turned up to.
really glad you stuck to your guns and sorted it
xxx
Wow, looks good Sam! But I think you have chosen to miss out an awful lot of stuff, so if you have to resort to having a go then It is only fair that I should put up the bits you have missed out and let others make up there own minds.
So lets start.
When you placed your order you were told that it would take time to find you what you wanted in Japan right from the start as specific mods and other thing take time to find.
We had evidence to show that you had worked on the car and not just covered it up, just because we didn’t win the case does not mean that you didn’t work on the car.
In court the other stuff that you alleged was not taken into account and a judgement was not made on this. You won the case because the car was mis-sold. The car should have had coilovers and a performance exhaust on it, which we should have checked, and we didn’t. We held up our hands on this and we did offer you at the time to put these issues right. We offered to sort out the alleged paint issues, put a HKS exhaust on for you and give you a set of Cusco coilovers, you can’t get fairer than that.
Now the paint job
Well the paint coming off under the arches was done by driving the car back the paint had not had time to hardened by the looks of it, for the rest of it I would say maybe if you cleaned it as there is this thing call dirt, which makes white paint, have patches which with a cleaning shampoo it will remove it.
And the car is sat outside my house if anyone wants to look at it…
The court
We only did not refund your money because we where advised by Trading Standards that we had a case and these are suppose to be the people that you should turn to in cases like this, we know now that this is not accurate!!!
In court you have that bit right the judge did say;
‘Mr. Davis, you don't seem to have much of a defence. In fact, you don't have a defence at all’
But you missed out the bit in front of it.
‘Trading Standards have given you the wrong advice and do not know the law, which I’m afraid Mr. Davis, you don't seem to have much of a defence. In fact, you don't have a defence at all.’
And as said before this was only on mis-selling the car and nothing else.
Now in court, if what you are saying in your words are true
i.e.
- To conclude, it is my opinion (Yes Jonathan, my OPINION so nothing libellous here) that DNA Cars proprietor Jonathan Davis of Southampton is a chancer and if he can get away with it a cheat. He tries to bully people into submission, he tried it with me and others have come forward to me with their stories. He won't listen to any laws unless he thinks they are in his favour and he doesn't learn from his mistakes.
I would never ever use him again, and if he had a part I desperately needed I would scrap my car before I bought it off him. If you have a deposit with him, GET IT BACK!
then the district judge would have given me a CCJ, BUT he said that I have been truthful and honest in all of the evidence that was before him and it would be unfair to give me a CCJ, the only way that he would give me one is if I did not pay you so I think that says it all.
One thing as well as people keep on going on about the weather on the day, your evidence was from Southampton to Stafford, this is a big area and the evidence that we put up was from Southampton only please look for yourself.
This is the only thing I am going to write about this as I am not going to waste my time but I did need to respond just so people know, and as I said no CCJ speaks for itself.
JOHN
DNA won't return the arches coz DNA's a dick and blindly believes that he can't be wrong and must win! Oh, he'll be pounded this time if I have anything to do with it - which I will!Great "Old" news sam was still an interesting read, i rofl when he told me the story of the court scenario, sucks about the arches though mate i remembered you telling me about that.
Why didnt DNA Cars reply about that? When he admits there your property?
Onwards and upwards fella let me know when you want the detailing to begin!!!!
Oh, by the way, congratulations on the birth, I hope they don't turn out anything like you - for the sake of the human race!
legalpickle
DNA won't return the arches coz DNA's a dick and blindly believes that he can't be wrong and must win! Oh, he'll be pounded this time if I have anything to do with it - which I will!
It was only causing it if the car had been dirty before painting! It was rough to the touch, the paint not dirt. Streetech on this site can confirm this.
Sam I suggest you reel this guy in. Ill ban him as he is adding nothing to this thread and it appears he joined just to flex his legal knowledge and insult people.