Right to defend yourself?

Dan507

Member +
I don't like the idea of people carring around guns. i think the best way to stop or perventing your self from getting robbed/broken into is by having a dog. in my house we have two, dont get me wrong they wont attack them but they will let you know their there. e.g every monday night around 11.30 there is a person who goes past my house on his skate board, and as soon as he turns into my road they have all ready herd him and bark constantly for 5 minits, (gets kinda annoying now).

My grandad was speeking to me the other day. one of his friends owns a farm and one night he herd some people taking from the barn, he proceds to go out side and finds some pikeys stealing his tractor he runs into the house gets his air rifle and shouts to his wife "phone the police" he then chased after them, he then fired a warning shoot but the pikeys stoped. by now the police arive and he explains to the officer what has happend. and the pikeys gave their side of the story. anyway the pikey got a slap on the wrist and the farmer lost his rifle liecence and got a £250 for using it for an improper use.

wheres the logic in that? either way the whole country is screwed.
think its time to imigrate to the US
 

GT-TD04

Supermoderator
i agree with this completely.
if i caught some some robbing from me,i wouldnt kill them,i start snipping fingers off,and as far as im concerned,they would of lost them breaking into my property.

Thats RA talk:haha::haha::haha:
 

GTti

Member +
No just you bringing up a thread that you got all hot and bothered about many months ago and my views on drugs which are totally irrelevant to this thread.

So people break in to steal valuables... and they need the money for what?You do not seem to see the relationship between cause and effect.

I miss the broader discussion how? It was about the right to defend ones self. I have put forth my view on this. If you think this is missing the broader discussion then why dont you enlighten us as to what you perceive the broader discussion to be?

You say I was up in arms as if I were ranting. I simply said that there are less harmful drugs than alcohol and that if we as a people are going to tackle substance abuse we should concentrate on those drugs which do most harm. You have now somehow twisted that in to me saying legalise other drugs to reduce problems when in fact that is not what I said. If you have calmed down enough now to revisit that thread I can open it back up and continue it with you.

Your comment above is not based on fact. The US cannot be a prime example of what you suggest. The simple reason is that the US never did introduce firearm usage it has always had firearms. The people have always had the right to carry them. It is not like there was a law made one day to say everyone can carry guns and suddenly everyone went and purchased them.

Of course in countries that have strict gun laws you could not just turn around and introduce the same liberal gun laws that the US has as it would be too much of a shift. You could however permit homeowners to have guns or at least introduce laws allowing them to protect themselves and their property.

Also you sound quite naive with a comment like "those who commit robbery will simply arm themselves" - do you think people dont already arm themselves?

Im not sure what point you are trying to make by posting firearm death statistics for the US?

Also regarding your comment on suicide related deaths with firearms are you suggesting that people commit suicide more because its easier if they have access to guns? The suicide rate in Ireland is extremely high per capita and there are very few firearms.

You are selectively choosing data reports and ignoring others. those statistics make alcohol abuse look like nothing in what country?? in the UK? well yes because the population is massive compared to the UK. How about doing a comparison that actually makes sense Luke. Lets look at the stats for American deaths due to alcohol which would make sense given you have quoted American deaths due to firearms.

I know you like your reports so have a look at this one
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5337a2.htm

Its from 2001 so has probably only gotten worse. It says Alcohol attributed deaths for 2001 is roughly 76,000, hardly what I would describe as "nothing".

That is just direct deaths and not deaths due to people being run over by drunk drivers or beaten to death by people out of their minds on drink not to mention people who are depressed and drunk and kill themselves.

Since you trust the CDC information I took the liberty of searching for marijuana related deaths and found no reports.

Again if you want to continue the drugs V alcohol discussion I am more than happy to open the thread back up. This thread is about right to defend though so I think we should probably bring it back on topic.

It is probably also worth mentioning that there are an estimated 350,000,000 (three hundred and fifty million) privately owned guns in the US. With the figures you have mentioned above it looks like 0.021% of these guns are involved in an accident or crime.


You closed the thread, I was happy to continue posting. But I guess like this discussion you're not really going to be in touch with reality.

So you’re trying to say most theft is caused to buy illegal drugs? I highly doubt that, most hard users wouldn’t have the capacity to commit routine and organised robbery. The act of robbery to buy drugs wouldn’t changed regardless on their legality.

RE: Your comments on drugs were also not based on fact, more lack of anything vaguely conclusive. You seem keen to throw these statements at me so you can have it right back.

I don't have a problem with people defending themselves, especially in their own home. This happens on a daily basis and this thread is a perfect example of self defence that isn't taken to an extreme.
My problem is that you seem to think home owners arming themselves with firearms is a good idea.



I don’t think my comment was naïve at all, those committing theft in peoples properties do not need guns in order to do so in the UK, any feeble weapon is enough. If we were in a situation where homeowners had a legal right to defend themselves with a firearm, then the thief is hardly going to come equipped with a screwdriver and credit card.

I actually don’t care for the facts, and you’re right you can’t compare between the UK and US, you never will. Common sense can answer the majority of questions here.

Has the right to carry firearms in the US reduced burglary? Probably no…
Do more people die as a result of this? Probably yes….
Do people feel less safe on the streets in the US? Probably yes…
Is there a massive black-market for illegal firearms in the US? Yes…

Would people in the UK feel less safe knowing people are potentially carrying firearms? Yes
Would more people die from gunshot related fatalities? Probably yes
Would the cost and ability to police our streets increase? Probably yes
Would the cost to the NHS increase? Probably yes

I’m not selectively choosing anything other than that a lot of people die from gun related deaths in the US, a lot of people are also wounded. This is something that people here in the UK do not want, I truly believe that in saying that the majority of people would agree.

The current measures in place for those with a licence here is strict, my step father has one.
I don’t care for the drugs thread, you won’t see the light, the coroner’s report has only just been released to us, they have an insight into these situations and their conclusions are much more valuable than your poor opinion on drugs.

I think the problem with you Dylan is that you seem overly Americanised.
 

GTti

Member +
Just a thought to the millions of people who've died from a bullet. A massive amount of respect should be shown, this is not something people should have in their home or on the street.
 
The basic human reaction when faced with confrontation is fight or flight, you're not going to flee your own home when your family are there your protective instinct kicks in.

Proffessional serial Burglars don't break into an occupied house normally and when they do it's unlikely you'll see or here them. As they are switched on, experienced and have pre planned what they're doing.

People are also forgetting that it's piss easy to get an illegal firearm in this country so allowing other people to hold legal firearms won't imo increase gun crime, as they have to account for the location of the weapon or face the legal consequences.

A legal firearm can be traced when used in a crime, so criminals use illegal firearms.

Gun crime is more of a social issue than a licensing and availability issue imo.

This country is ridiculous when the Bodygaurds of Gerry Adams etc are provided with Handguns by the MoD yet ex soldiers and police officers are having their Personal Protection Weapons and licences taken off them.

Current high risk PSNI officers can't even get PPW licenses at the minute.

I think the law should be changed in relation to protecting your home.

However completely relaxing those and firearm laws at the same time is a bad idea, the government view would probably be that it is to protect a normal law abiding citizen from doing something they wouldn't normally have done i.e. killing someone in the heat of the moment when a burglar is unarmed and fleeing.

Education and teaching respect about weapons is very important. I think this is lacking in america and it is one of it's downfalls.
 

GTti

Member +
There are far better ways. Certainly not relaxed laws on firearms.

Education, policing, increased home security standards, any method of crime prevention.
 
Last edited:

Gav_Kara

Member +
If anyone breaks into our house then god help them they will be met by my 2yr old 5 stone staffy thats always alert at the slightest noise and movement!
 
GTti said:
There are far better ways. Certainly not relaxed laws on firearms.

Education, policing, increased home security standards, any method of crime prevention.
I agree with that, I don't think that everyone having access to firearms is the solution to home protection, the change in the law with regards to liability of the homeowner if someone injures themself while in your house and also giving you the right to physically remove them.

The situation here in NI is slightly different, there are those who is someone breaks into their house there is a good chance it isn't just to steal, these people should be able to obtain a PPW if there is a threat against them.

Even joe bloggs in the street should be able to get a PPW if there is a known threat; curently the police just come out to your house and tell you there is a threat on your life. Much use that is.
 

gv1.3

Admin
You closed the thread, I was happy to continue posting. But I guess like this discussion you're not really going to be in touch with reality.

No you resorted to threats and insults if I recall, my thread wasd otherwise interesting until that point

So you’re trying to say most theft is caused to buy illegal drugs? I highly doubt that, most hard users wouldn’t have the capacity to commit routine and organised robbery. The act of robbery to buy drugs wouldn’t changed regardless on their legality.

Please show me where I said MOST theft is committed to buy illegal drugs. You have a habit of misquoting. So you believe most hardened drug users wouldnt have the capacity to commit a routine robbery? Tell that to all of the people who are robbed by people out of their minds on drugs and have their houses broken in to by drug addicts looking for easy money. Ive lived in inner city Dublin I have witnessed it first hand if you are claiming that hardened drug addicts do not commit routine robbery you have no clue what you are talking about.

RE: Your comments on drugs were also not based on fact, more lack of anything vaguely conclusive. You seem keen to throw these statements at me so you can have it right back.

My comments on drugs are that alcohol kills and it is proven. And my feeling is we should tackle drugs that cause most deaths. You disagree and that is fine. But dont quote studies and try to twist numbers by comparing the UK alcohol death rate with the US gun death rate. It is a stupid comparison with the differences in population and the US figures I posted made your comment that gun deaths make alcohol deaths look like "nothing" look equally stupid. If you are going to quote studies to try prove a point make sure they are relevant to the conversation.


I don't have a problem with people defending themselves, especially in their own home. This happens on a daily basis and this thread is a perfect example of self defence that isn't taken to an extreme.
My problem is that you seem to think home owners arming themselves with firearms is a good idea.

You make it sound like I am the only one who thinks this is a good idea like I am some crazy vigilante. It is law where I currently live and in many other countries around the world. I agree with that law and you do not its quite simple and nothing for you to have a "problem" with.

I don’t think my comment was naïve at all, those committing theft in peoples properties do not need guns in order to do so in the UK, any feeble weapon is enough. If we were in a situation where homeowners had a legal right to defend themselves with a firearm, then the thief is hardly going to come equipped with a screwdriver and credit card.

Sorry but that is not what you said. You said they would bring weapons. You did not say they would bring guns. You made it sound like thieves do not already arm themselves if you now say you meant they would bring guns thats fine. Although guns are quite prolific in crimes these days anyway. If someone wants a gun they can have one.

I actually don’t care for the facts, and you’re right you can’t compare between the UK and US, you never will. Common sense can answer the majority of questions here.

Well that says it all. If you do not care for the facts why are you quoting a CDC study? You care about the facts when you think they back up your argument but when they are shown not to suddenly you do not care about them. You cannot compare between the UK and US as they have vastly different population sizes, but you did try to compare them in your previous post, I am glad you now agree with me now though.


Has the right to carry firearms in the US reduced burglary? Probably no…
how would it reduce burglary? People here have always had the right to carry guns since the birth of the nation.

Do more people die as a result of this? Probably yes….
probably yes based upon what?

Do people feel less safe on the streets in the US? Probably yes…
probably yes based upon what?

Is there a massive black-market for illegal firearms in the US? Yes…
There is a black market in every country for firearms. I would argue that the black market for firearms in the US is probably smaller than most countries. Why would I need to buy an illegal firearm when I can just walk in to a shop and buy a legal one.


Its difficult to converse with you on the points above given you have now abandoned fact.


Would people in the UK feel less safe knowing people are potentially carrying firearms? Yes
People are potentially carrying firearms today. There was a shoot out in the middle of the day in London last year remember.

Would more people die from gunshot related fatalities? Probably yes
more speculation

Would the cost and ability to police our streets increase? Probably yes
more speculation

Would the cost to the NHS increase? Probably yes
more speculation and it would still not put a dent in what alcohol costs the NHS :)


I’m not selectively choosing anything other than that a lot of people die from gun related deaths in the US, a lot of people are also wounded. This is something that people here in the UK do not want, I truly believe that in saying that the majority of people would agree.
You are selectively picking pieces of what I say. Look back through my posts and you will see that I clearly say bringing very liberal gun laws into countries such as Ireland and the UK would not work. The US has always had the right to bear arms and so your direct comparisons, again, are not very insightful.


The current measures in place for those with a licence here is strict, my step father has one.
My father has a license for a gun and should be allowed use it to defend his home if some scumbag breaks in to steal or attack


I don’t care for the drugs thread, you won’t see the light, the coroner’s report has only just been released to us, they have an insight into these situations and their conclusions are much more valuable than your poor opinion on drugs.
I wont see what light? Because I say governments should look at all drugs and their respective impacts on users and you do not agree it does not mean you are right. You dont see the devastating damage alcohol causes thousands of people every year so I would say you are the one with a poor opinion on drugs. I view all drugs as being harmful and recognise that they all have negative effects.


I think the problem with you Dylan is that you seem overly Americanised.
Thats pretty pathetic really and a pretty desperate comment. You think I have a problem because I have a different opinion than you do? I have spent the vast majority of my life living in Ireland and have always had strong opinions on drugs, crime, politics etc. There are mountains of things regarding America which I disagree with and some that I agree with. Bear in mind that you are the one who began quoting CDC (US) studies not me. Now I wont fire back with personal attacks because we disagree on a thread, I will stick to facts and my opinion and you can stick to speculation, misquoting and attempts to explain why I do not see things the way you do due to my current geographic location.
 
Top