After having a few members on here e-mail me about this thread (thanks) I thought it was time the crap stopped!
After having worked in the industry full time for over 7 years I knew that one day a thread like this would occur when the wrong side of a story is being stated here and I would have to step in and correct it as to this date I have worked my arse off to ensure every customers car is as best as it could be and never had a complaint.
For a living I don’t advertise mapping of Emanage units because the level of cars I work on daily would not last 1 minute with one fitted. But over the years I have mapped many of them for friends of friends like I have done this time with Dan.
Same goes for the Apexi AVCR. As I fit Syvecs, Pectel, Life racing and Motecs standalone ecus which have boost control which knocks the socks off any external EBC as they have proper closed loop control with adjustment factors for ACT, ECT, EGT, EOT, BARO. Because of this I got a manual of the internet for Dans car and wired it up as shown on a guide to ensure it was done correct. I then setup cylinder count on the AVCR to ensure the RPM of the AVCR matched the engine speed which it did perfectly.
Over the years again I had still set many of the avcr up so after that set the open loop boost duties right to hold the desired boost and then turned on the feedback which you can see was working correctly by Dans video which displayed the ** in the boost level. Which I see Dan has Played with and now messed up all the settings!
When it was mapped back 3 monthes ago there was an issue with the boost not holding all the way to the redline so I asked Dan to check all the boost pipes, check the turbo was good (ex wheel), check the diaphragm in the wastegate and a few other parts.
I get a phone call then a couple of weeks ago to say that the internal wastegate port of the turbo had not been properly sealed off (he runs external wastegete) which causes all sorts of grief with turbo control. He also stated he changed the exhaust manifold. As Dan was worried about the changes this would have on the engine I advised him to bring it up to the dyno so I could check it out. As I now had a new laptop I struggled to get the emanage software to talk with the unit so I did a few runs on the car and setup the boost control so it held boost perfectly to the redline . The fueling was perfect at 11.5:1 so I checked the ignition timing was spot on by marking the dizzy and moving advanced slightly to check that the timing was at as close to MBT as possible which it was as advancing made no difference to power and no knock was created.
Gave the thumbs up but then noticed that the torque was still dropping rapidly, now as the boost is holding perfectly I stated to Dan that the engines volume efficiency is dropping at the top end compared to Erics (another member of here with same setup which I mapped) Because of this I stated that there must be some difference with the cam setup or excessive back pressure in the exhaust manifold.
Now I see all the experts on here have stated to look at the bottom pulley mark and see if it matches up with the top marks! This might be the case with standard cams on a standard engine with stock head gasket but when aftermarket cams are fitted with different engine components they need to be setup to the cam manufactures settings with a dial gauge hence why they come with a spec sheet and why adjustable cam pulleys were designed!
Now onto the marks regarding ive not finished the job!
A Calibrator/Mappers job is to setup the calibration on the ecu to the engines state when brought to the dyno and if adjustable cam gears are available change these to maximize the engine volume efficiency.
If a car has a faulty part or problem with the engines build then yes the calibration can not be complete and the customer gets charged for the work done and dyno hire not a FLAT RATE to just map the car fully.. If it was a flat rate then it is up to the tuner to decide if the job is fully complete by not stating any problems. As I could see there was a difference in the torque graph of the 2 cars I suggest to dan what to check and do. As there is a problem with the engine build setup I can do no more so my hired job is done. What is hard to understand about that?
As all of the tuners here seem to road map they would class the job im sure complete as would not see the torque issue without a dyno
Now after reading the comments on here regarding myself and friends (Charlie@SRR) and having a customer question my advise constantly. I have stated that maybe its best he takes it elsewhere. His nearest tuner is Matt@AFR who I know well and suggested to contact him.
With regards to the comments about myself being a Tool and full of BS.
When you have tuned the cars around the world which have won hands down the HKS Drag Series, Time attack 2 years in a row and also set world records/class records as well as tune the highest HP road cars in the World maybe I will listen to you.
Don’t believe me check out my facebook page which is updated a lot more then my webpage
http://www.facebook.com/pages/2Bartuning/210633775647669
Or a rating score board like below
http://www.mkivsupra.net/vbb/showthread.php?129455-Supra-ECU-Register