can a starlet or glanza ever handle like an EK9

GT-TD04

Supermoderator
yeh i no m8 sellin it in the summer so not spendin n e more money on it.Why do the 17s make it handle bad m8 as when i put them on the corsa it handled a hundred times better.I thought the wider tyres=more grip as long as tyres are gd.

mainly because you probably went from stock wheels to the 17's on the corsa and the have bigger arches i think,can't see it making a lot of difference either way though.

As to why,dunno tbh,ask riko lol
 

GTti

Member +
But as Luke rightly said - money will buy you handling, it's just the suspension layout will determine which has the edge. Getting grip out of a car, is easy...getting decent steering & chassis feel, adjustability, mid-corner bump compliance, and handling balance...is not

I have coilovers that are identical/similar to D2
Spring rates:
Front 6kg per mm (Or 335.9 lbs per inch)
Rear 4kg (223.9 lbs per inch)

The car is polybushed
OEM strut brace
OEM front and rear anti-roll bars (Already quite heavy duty)

Spring rates as you can see are very solid for a light car :eek:, no PAS so you can feel whats going on.

I run neutral toe on the front and some toe-in on the rear to aid the front steer in when cornering. Also maximum camber on the front and and a little camber on the rear to allow maximum tyre contact on cornering.

None of this has been tested by myself, but is the basis of a good handling car on a track - and proven by other members.
With a starlet being so similar I should think an identical setup would suit.

The weight of our cars is a very good advantage in the corners. Not only can you brake late, accelerate early but there is less lateral transition of weight - and if you have the car setup for cornering then you can fly.
 
Last edited:

Gee

Member +
I wish I got more feedback and have thought about removing PAS, but I'd probably get fed up with it after a while, with it being an everyday car.
 

sx_turbo

Lifer
I have coilovers that are identical/similar to D2
Spring rates:
Front 6kg per mm (Or 335.9 lbs per inch)
Rear 4kg (223.9 lbs per inch)

The car is polybushed
OEM strut brace
OEM front and rear anti-roll bars (Already quite heavy duty)

Spring rates as you can see are very solid for a light car :eek:, no PAS so you can feel whats going on.

I run neutral toe on the front and some toe-in on the rear to aid the front steer in when cornering. Also maximum camber on the front and and a little camber on the rear to allow maximum tyre contact on cornering.

None of this has been tested by myself, but is the basis of a good handling car on a track - and proven by other members.
With a starlet being so similar I should think an identical setup would suit.

The weight of our cars is a very good advantage in the corners. Not only can you brake late, accelerate early but there is less lateral transition of weight - and if you have the car setup for cornering then you can fly.

what would be the maximum camber?

i have read and been told that 2 degrees camber would be ideal for street use.

i know u said yours is setup for track use. im just curious
 

sx_turbo

Lifer
I wish I got more feedback and have thought about removing PAS, but I'd probably get fed up with it after a while, with it being an everyday car.


i personally feel that the starlets power steering provides plenty of feed back
 

GTti

Member +
I've not had it measured yet. I would think its over 2 degrees but below 3. I doubt 2 degrees is any good for the road though - thats a substancial amount imo.

Running camber and running on roads that are mostly cambered with pull you all over the place. And wear your tyres out.
 
Last edited:

GTti

Member +
I wish I got more feedback and have thought about removing PAS, but I'd probably get fed up with it after a while, with it being an everyday car.

I would think so :p

Starlet's are still quite responsive, but no PAS is still completely different. It's only difficult at low speeds.
 

Franza1

Supermoderator & Area Reps Manager
The idea compromise of camber between tyre wear and handeling on a street car seems to be around the 1.5degree mark. That's what mine is set to. I still get a bit of pulling to one side due to the camber of the road but nothing major. I still get a bit of understear but it's very predictable. i'm running a 1.5 way LSD aswell.

as for the The 17 inch alloys Read Here for a little write up about it i did a while back > http://www.toyotagtturbo.com/showthread.php?t=64
 

riko666

Member +
Sorry, don't believe that. With Tein Hard springs/KYB SuperSpecial/20mm rear sway bar/Carbing upper and lower front bars/Whiteline rear bar I BLEW my friend's EK9 into the weeds. It was so easy it wasn't even funny. The EK9 is a twitchy beast at high speeds on anything but the smoothest surface. I didn't even have an LSD like him. No contest. I've taken on all Hondas (bar an NSX) and I have fun accelerating thorough the corners just to embarrass them.

Was the EK9 modified to the same extent? If so, you can't really compare then can you? And beating people...it's still a question of the skill of the driver...you cannot presume everyone has the required driving skills

An EK9 is twitchy? Fark - at high speeds, the EP/EL Chassis as standard is lethal

And Ricky - I would argue the fact on Steering as I feel there's very little feedback unless at the limits of steering lock in fast cornering...but I've had Dan drive my car when I was banned in Le Mans, and he commented on how lighter the steering was than his. Mind you, "steering weight" is not to be confused with feel
 
Last edited:

Franza1

Supermoderator & Area Reps Manager
Well at least we are discussing somthing that matters to everyday driving in this thread. I wouldn't mind stock power and a car that handles on rails
 

Gord R

Member +
I thought the wider tyres=more grip as long as tyres are gd.

A mistake a few people make im my opinion. Going wider on tyres and "over tyring" can have a negative effect , steerling feel can be lost , and understeer may become more apparant, certainly in front wheel drive stuff.

For sure transmitting power to the tarmac a wide tyre will improve traction/grip but for cornering its a much different ball game.

I went from 205's to 195's on my 206 and the difference was very noticable. The 195's were a vast improvement.

By all means, going wider than stock size will be of advantage buts in important to get the balance right between too wide and too narrow. Im facing that decision at the moment, my glanza has come into the country with 225's on 8x16 wheel which seems rather wide.
 

Franza1

Supermoderator & Area Reps Manager
A mistake a few people make im my opinion. Going wider on tyres and "over tyring" can have a negative effect , steerling feel can be lost , and understeer may become more apparant, certainly in front wheel drive stuff.

I went from 205's to 195's on my 206 and the difference was very noticable. The 195's were a vast improvement.

By all means, going wider than stock size will be of advantage buts in important to get the balance right between too wide and too narrow. Im facing that decision at the moment, my glanza has come into the country with 225's on 8x16 wheel which seems rather wide.

Man that is massive, I'm running 195/50/15
 

sx_turbo

Lifer
I've not had it measured yet. I would think its over 2 degrees but below 3. I doubt 2 degrees is any good for the road though - thats a substancial amount imo.

Running camber and running on roads that are mostly cambered with pull you all over the place. And wear your tyres out.

hmmmmm

well im running 2 degrees (well prob closer to 3) and it does handle very well and i dont have any pull from road cambers.

the inside of the tyre does wear quicker though
 

riko666

Member +
too wide won't garner more understeer - you're physically putting down a greater contact patch, but understeer would probably be a lot more sudden then a thinner tyre as you won't have the give of the tyre to shift the contact patch quite as much

Ricky - tramlining (the car pulling onto road camber changes) is more of a result of wider tyres and lsd's, not camber of the front tyres

Rory - on the live axle point, true, on a Smooth race track, the different would probably be negligible, perhaps even giving the advantage to the beam rear axle as a) you have a much greater amount of stabilising weight in the suspension itself, and b) having minimal geometry changes at the rear axle, you won't be susceptible to high loading geometry changes (toe-out etc) which could create a nervous rear-end. However, bumpy road, hard suspension, beam axle versus independant rear....no contest, whatsoever if you have lets say, race drivers (cause everyone always seems to be "better" than someone despite their minimal credentials...) driving each...
 

sx_turbo

Lifer
And Ricky - I would argue the fact on Steering as I feel there's very little feedback unless at the limits of steering lock in fast cornering...but I've had Dan drive my car when I was banned in Le Mans, and he commented on how lighter the steering was than his. Mind you, "steering weight" is not to be confused with feel

i must admit my first car was a mk2 fiesta, and the only other car i drive is a peugoet partner, so any thing feels better than those lol
 

Pierros

Member +
To make things more simple...

-Can you make your Starlet handle like a normar EK9 Type-R? With some modding YES.

-Can you make your Starlet handle better than most Civic's? With more heavy modding and right adjustement YES.

-Can you make make your Starlet with the same amount of modifications/adjustments better than an equally modded Civic? NO

Although with the right setup Glanza's can do miracles in the track (as well as they can do in the streets), Civic are also a notable opponent.

I've seen a street legal EG9 Civic with a K20A swap (modded at 245bhp), running the track, 1sec slower than a time EVO8 with 400+bhp, both driven from tha same pro-driver.

Of course the Civic was well prepared and made the brand new semi-slicks that was wearing, useless after 200km, but he got he did a hell of a job.


Anyway back on the subject, with some decent coilovers, front and rear strut braces, swaybar and lower arms, a panhard rod, upgraded clutch, a good (1.5 preferably) LSD, good brakes, lightweight wheels and some sticky rubber (15/195/50 or 16/205/45) and most important the right settings in all of these parts, you won't believe how the car will handles!
 
Last edited:

GTti

Member +
too wide won't garner more understeer - you're physically putting down a greater contact patch, but understeer would probably be a lot more sudden then a thinner tyre as you won't have the give of the tyre to shift the contact patch quite as much

Are you sure? An organic clutch has more surface area but provides less clamping force than a paddle clutch.

I think there is a balance to be had. But running a medium width tyre will spread the contact but also maintain the force in that contact area which should encourage grip. I suppose it depends how much force you will be transfering to the tyres.

A very wide wheel and tyre will probably contribute to understeer in regards to weight more than anything else.


Ricky - tramlining (the car pulling onto road camber changes) is more of a result of wider tyres and lsd's, not camber of the front tyres

My GTti is responsive to road camber with 185 tyre widths. The tracking was done by myself but is pretty accurate and steers perfectly straight :p
 

59bhp

Member +
i think the steering feel/feedback on a stock chassis isnt brilliant but its made 100 times worse when putting bigger wheels and tyres on.

I was always wondering why people were saying that the steering is awful when ive drove cars that are much worse, then i put the 15's on and i see what everyone means. Just an observation ive made really but i suppose its easily sorted.
 

riko666

Member +
Luke - for the Clutch example, it's the material choice that generates the friction with the deficit of surface area, it is far more abbrasive and will work at much higher temperatures
 
Top