max'd out potential?

S

Starlet_Sam's_Mum

Member +
Fatman said:
this is 350bhp

IMG_1939.jpg
Click to expand...

Hey man, don't mean to sound like a bellend here, but, i think 223kW is actually equal to 298.82 bhp

Fatman said:
It went on to make 240wkw or ~380bhp
Click to expand...

you mean 321.6 bhp

I don't mean to stir things up, just like things being correct.

298.82 still sounds alot, i dont know anything about tuning mind.

Still..............230 bhp per litre! EPIC.

PeaCe honkeys
 
riko666

riko666

Member +
A kilowatt is hp x 1.3 so I'm afraid Fatman is correct!

Edit: Actually its between yours and his results! Closer to yours though
 
Sheldon

Sheldon

Malta Area Rep.
Starlet_Sam's_Mum said:
Hey man, don't mean to sound like a bellend here, but, i think 223kW is actually equal to 298.82 bhp



you mean 321.6 bhp

I don't mean to stir things up, just like things being correct.

298.82 still sounds alot, i dont know anything about tuning mind.

Still..............230 bhp per litre! EPIC.

PeaCe honkeys
Click to expand...

240 Wkw - 380bhp... NOT at the wheels..
 
S

Starlet_Sam's_Mum

Member +
So its 15% on top of 298 bhp? or is it 15% off the engine bhp?

so for example

298*0.15=44.7
so 298+44.7 = 342.7bhp

or is it

350*0.15 = 52 so take 52 off 350 = 298bhp (so would be 350 engine bhp)

which one is it stealth mode?
 
Sheldon

Sheldon

Malta Area Rep.
Starlet_Sam's_Mum said:
So its 15% on top of 298 bhp? or is it 15% off the engine bhp?

so for example

298*0.15=44.7
so 298+44.7 = 342.7bhp

or is it

350*0.15 = 52 so take 52 off 350 = 298bhp (so would be 350 engine bhp)

which one is it stealth mode?
Click to expand...

298.82 + 17% = 349.61bhp not everyones uses 15% so i was wrong with that so i guess he used 17% ?

someething like that cos im bad with maths lol. but first he says wkw so at the wheels and then the usual bhp at the fly..

:confused: il let him explain! gn lol
 
Fatman

Fatman

Member +
Dyno figures are in wheel kilowatts, I converted to bhp using a nominal 17% loss figure (I did say which figure i'd used) which I've seen mentioned in many threads here. To be honest that's another discussion entirely, I suspect the transmission losses are actually a great deal less than that, I just wanted to keep the numbers comparable to many of the figures that get tossed around on this board. 15% or 17%, fairly unimportant in the scheme of things.

Are we done with the push/pull nonsense yet?
 
G

GaryGT

Member +
TurboDave said:
Step 1 - Air/fuel mixture enters the cylinder when the intake valve opens.

Step 2 - Air/fuel mixture are compressed and ignited by the spark plug.

Step 3 - Controlled explosion pushes the piston down.

Step 4 - Upward motion of the piston pushes the exhaust gasses out of the exhaust valve.

NO need to be a bellend is there?
Click to expand...



Sound man cheers for that
so now explain to us who are listening
your theory on how Air enters an engine???
if the Piston is been used for the above mentioned cycles ????
Im just really curious??? love to learn man ;)
 
billybob

billybob

Untrusted Seller
GaryGT said:
EEEEh no ya mad man stop stirrring the POT ya fucker
it will be a TOP MOUNTED SETUP but with a rather different Runner and collector chamber design ;)
Click to expand...

seems interesting always wanted the topmounted turbo look ,looking foward to seening one lad ,whats the advange of a topmonted manifold?
 
Fatman

Fatman

Member +
There isn't one really. Can potentially make it easier to fit a larger turbo in with space constraints and can look cooler.
 
G

GaryGT

Member +
billybob said:
seems interesting always wanted the topmounted turbo look ,looking foward to seening one lad ,whats the advange of a topmonted manifold?
Click to expand...


HaHa ur some Boy
Going FISHING anybody ????????????????
;););)
Il show u the advantages when its on the car ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top