what forged pistons

fur

Member +
Ah, he will be from some far off land with "magic" dynos I believe ;)

typical, always have to resort to talking down to persons that are not from the uk
only UK dynos work right, i forgot
now emailing my contacts in australia, jamaica, guyana and backyard productions in the US to tell them all that their flat top CP pistons are no good and the dynos showing near 300whp are all wrong cuz they are "from some far off land with magic dynos" ie. not in the uk

u guys really do amaze me with this low thinking, it is one thing to state facts, but another thing to base ure comments on bias and one-sided thinking, have a nice day sir, continue in ignorance
 
typical, always have to resort to talking down to persons that are not from the uk
only UK dynos work right, i forgot
now emailing my contacts in australia, jamaica, guyana and backyard productions in the US to tell them all that their flat top CP pistons are no good and the dynos showing near 300whp are all wrong cuz they are "from some far off land with magic dynos" ie. not in the uk

u guys really do amaze me with this low thinking, it is one thing to state facts, but another thing to base ure comments on bias and one-sided thinking, have a nice day sir, continue in ignorance


I thought as you were so good at sarcasm you would understand it, obviously not..........Excuse me while I pick your dummy up ;)


Relax :)
 

dantheman

Member +
flat top pistons will be fine at 250bhp...its not dependent on power anyway,boost and igntion and setup is what it boils down to... i ran 2bar on my ross flat tops in my gti-r for quite a while and it got driven hard, no probs with them... ;) although i prefer to run dished wiseco's in my 4e as i like to have lower comp for safety as i run a fair bit of boost ( im running a large turbo so im not really loosing much low down power by having a lower cr anyway..)

dished are preffered though as the combustion is contained in the dish, and not on the surrounding area's ie head gasket..

if you wanna keep lag to a minimum and retain some low down response id go for flat tops mate (in my opinion)

(search for the thread for more info) :)
 

speedvision

Member +
the stock piston just has a 1cc dish which is almost a flat top piston....i fu compare a flat top with a stock 1cc dish u will see what i am tlkin about..

companies as i got to believe make them flat top as they are easier to make and much more cost productive ...they make up for the 1cc compression lost in the valve pockets.........

it is up to you and ur engine builder what u want to use but keep in mind both flat top and dished forged pistons are very strong...

200-250 bhp u wont have any problems with flat top and u will also get a better response off the turbo as compared to the lower compression one..

most pple like response hence why they go for stock compression as opposed to lower ones

sam
 
Are the CP pistons not 9.0:1??


Custom made to our specs by CP Pistons, engineered with custom features to enhance performance and strength. This is a multi-fit piston. Nominal compression ratios are as follows and can be adjusted with gaskets, deck clearances and head modifications:
3E = 9.3:1
4E = 8.0:1
4EFTE = 9.0:1
5EFTE= 8.5:1
 

fur

Member +
Are the CP pistons not 9.0:1??


Custom made to our specs by CP Pistons, engineered with custom features to enhance performance and strength. This is a multi-fit piston. Nominal compression ratios are as follows and can be adjusted with gaskets, deck clearances and head modifications:
3E = 9.3:1
4E = 8.0:1
4EFTE = 9.0:1
5EFTE= 8.5:1

5E is more like 9.5:1. That is in my 74.5mm 5E anyways. But the are supposed to be 9:1 in the 4e as u stated...............

????
 
So if Toyota spend x amount on development of the 4e to arrive at a comp ratio of 8.2:1 on a CT9 @std boost why would you want to raise it to runner a bigger turbo and more boost. Are you lowering comp by another method or using race fuel?
 

Sharagath

Member +
How did you come to those calculations?


i had a other formula picture, but can't find it.
c5afb1bf27a2cb5ee840ddac5de10516.png

3afd933b679b7b20f1561c841867f901.png

Vc= Vs / CR - 1
b
= cylinder bore (diameter)
s
= piston stroke length
V
c = volume of the combustion chamber (including head gasket)
Vs = displacement

first calcualte back the combustion camber witch gives you the head cc's
add the new values(head gasket, pistons) to the head cc's.

don't you think it is correct?
 
Last edited:

turboflow

Member +
i am running a ct9 now and probably will only ever run a hybrid or something that will spawl low like the ct9

owen
 

turboflow

Member +
i am no expert as i am the one who made the post but i am still swinging towards dished becuase when explained to by dave it made perfect sense if you blow something up directly next top a gasket its never going to do it any good. do carry on with the sarcasm and daves witty replies its keeping me amused at work at this ungodly hour. lol

cheers

owen
 

fur

Member +
So if Toyota spend x amount on development of the 4e to arrive at a comp ratio of 8.2:1 on a CT9 @std boost why would you want to raise it to runner a bigger turbo and more boost. Are you lowering comp by another method or using race fuel?

because toyota didn't expect me to take out their stock, untuneable ecu and put in a microtech or megasquirt or power FC
and it should be obvious why i would want higher compression to spool a bigger turbo..............and btw the compression isn't lowered with any other method and the fuel is camel piss with water/methonol coming in after 8 psi
 

speedvision

Member +
because toyota didn't expect me to take out their stock, untuneable ecu and put in a microtech or megasquirt or power FC
and it should be obvious why i would want higher compression to spool a bigger turbo..............and btw the compression isn't lowered with any other method and the fuel is camel piss with water/methonol coming in after 8 psi

lol

sam
 
Top