Sheldon
Malta Area Rep.
something like that, remember the japs have 100 ron fuel
yes.. we dont know what this guy used for mapping and on dyno?
something like that, remember the japs have 100 ron fuel
Ohh so its IN THEORY now well thats bollox you have to see what its able to do physically not bloody theory ,there are so many different parameters that could effect how much an engine can output and different tune ups that they wouldnt even compare if you do 2 engines identical which in theory they should put out thesame
I'm not sure if you have a learning difficulty or maybe it is simply the language barrier, but I am not going to bother challanging anything you have just written above as you obviously do not grasp anything I have tried to say.
Just one question.
Can a CT9 produce 400hp?
If you believe the answer is no, then how do you know without physically trying?
Here's an idea...go see if you can fly
We are talking stock 4EFTE though..Dub had headwork like you say.
Whatever anyway, LOL. I'm bored now and banning myself from this thread!
really? wow, i thought you would have got engine tuner to do it
lol,believe me lad,im not one bit worried abt a power figure for a ct9.its just that seems far fetched at 207bhp on a 'standard' engine.well i think its you who have to dry your eyes and people who seem to cry when they see a good rr figure so many broken hearts on here when they see near and over 200bhp on a ct9 :beer:
Nexia, you need to relax mate, your very up tight
The fact this set up pulling that kind of figure for the first time is causing a big debate and people doubting, naturally.
Personally, I don't doubt, because I don't really care about 1 figure as there are soo many variables that a "true" figure doesn't actually exist and on the road day to day the engines power will vary FACT. So why the hell care or be caught up over 1 figure?
Like mentioned, figures are not important, they are just to give a rough guide and a bit of fun. If it goes well and meets your satisfaction then why on earth worry?
dont worry about it Ivan... its not worth bothering
as long as our cars run like hell down the qtm were happy
besides, the invitation to anybody to come on a trip over to race down hal far is always open
kon
i dont worry mate but when you take your car to a rr that reads whp and they tell you thats not possible it piss me off then wtf you take your cars to rr if then after you are gona debate what you can see! If someone come with getting 250bhp on a ct9 like someone clever tried to give an example with 400bhp! i would understand its not possible but if my car with the ct9 and standalone and yes i dont have power steering and ac get 159bhp atw which is 190bhp atf how can people that didnt even see my car run on the road or on the track say nah thats too much for what you have , thats not theoritically possible with a ct9 ! I andrstand that they ask questions "on what i have to achiev that bhp figure " but I only can list the things i have cant say anything on the tune up, or if with the dizzy from a ford 2ltr ohc mated to the gt shaft and a cossie coil is more efficient than the starlet one !
If you knew me you would know im not a guy that worry mate but when i read certain negative comments on here make me
nexia there isnt one car over here that could do 190 bhp with only 2psi over standard boost no matter what the map. seems like reasonable doubt to me. your car is clearly fast as its doing 13.8s tho so well done for that. you sure your boost guage reads right tho?
I think the sad thing about this post is that it shows how many bhp chasers on here there are. BHP figures don't mean dick at the end of the day, and belong in the pub with the chavs and their packets of McCoy crisps and pints of Stella. It's not about the figures, it's how it drives on the road that counts.
This threads lost its way, and pretty soon, it's going to go in the bin as nothing useful's being said.